The US Securities and Exchange Commission first charged Ripple Labs with illegal securities offerings almost six months ago.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a complaint against Ripple Labs Inc. and two of its executives, who are also significant holders, alleging that they raised more than $1.3 billion through an unregistered, ongoing digital asset securities offering.
SEC’s Case May be Faulty
Many people in the crypto community believe the SEC’s case is faulty on multiple levels. In fact, it could be argued that the agency is aware of this. For beginners, the SEC informed Judge Netburn in a recent filing that a loss in the case would have far-reaching consequences, as future defendants would be allowed to use Ripple’s defense as precedent.
Furthermore, Jay Clayton, the ex-Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), who initiated the lawsuit, recently co-authored an op-ed in which he seemed to repeat some of Ripple’s old talking points.
Against the background of Ripple’s small legal victories over recent months, do these developments sound as confident as the SEC has? The answer is negative according to many.
Attorney John Deaton has already made headlines for filing a motion to intervene on behalf of XRP investors in the aforementioned lawsuit.
In support of XRP holders, Deaton also argued that the SEC had disputed the independence of XRP. This led XRP Holders to intervene in order to “develop the Court’s understanding of XRP’s current use, technology and development.”
While Deaton has always argued that the SEC and Ripple Labs, like the other defendants in the lawsuit, are in no position to represent the XRP holders he has been representing, he has also argued that the regulatory agency was wrong to take the San Francisco-based firm to court.
In his recent Twitter thread on “What is the LAW” the managing partners of Deaton Legal Firm cited the observations of Judge Castel in the Telegram case again to argue that the SEC case of Garlinghouse and Larsen, Ripple Labs and its managers, was faulty at some stage.
All this is conjecture at the end of the day, with no party sure what the court is going to do. However, according to Deaton, if the court follows the precedent, the pendulum swings in the path of the defendant.
Spike in Market’s Volatility as $2.5 Billion Worth of Bitcoin Options Expires Today
Bitcoin ‘Solidifies’ Support At $58K As Volatility in the BTC Falls to a 7-month low.
Another Country Partnered with the Ripple to Assist them in Building CBDC
DOGE Not Good for Crypto as it has “Inflationary Dynamics”, CEO Ripple Brad Garlinghouse.
CryptoGames, The Unsurpassed Competitor in the Crypto Gambling Industry
Recent Press Release
Bitcoin As a Prototype of Central Banks
Bitcoin is a computerized currency that “utilizes decentralized technology to work with no centralized system or financial firms,” according to...
Hitches that cryptocurrency can pose to the financial sector
New upcoming companies are increasingly engaging in accessing the bitcoin market. After focusing for generations on bitcoin’s capabilities, prices, operational...
Bitcoin Address- A brief overview
Anyone who wants to buy or sell anything using Bitcoin must send money from a specified location, akin to how...
Why should you prefer Blockchain Technology?
From one end of the world toward the other, blockchain technology is without question the most fiercely contested issue. Since...
Can Cryptocurrencies eventually overtake all economic mechanisms?
Bitcoin has been spoken about a lot for a lengthy moment. Still, they’re becoming known as monetary instruments that can...